AI-generated concept illustration of a reconfigurable open-plan workspace; not a photograph of a built project.
Generated for ARCHITECTT; studio-owned.

The moving frame

Motion generated by AI from this article's frame · © ARCHITECTT
← News & Press

Concept Study

The Adaptable Floorplate: Hedging Against Asset Obsolescence

An unbuilt exploration into the decoupling of internal partitions from structural infrastructure to mitigate asset obsolescence.

ARCHITECTT··4 min read

The ARCHITECTT adaptable floorplate study proposes treating internal walls as reusable furniture rather than fixed infrastructure. By centralising MEP services into a perimeter plinth and spine, the study demonstrates how mixed-use blocks can reconfigure unit counts in under 72 hours to meet changing market demands.

In short

ARCHITECTT, an architecture studio based on the French Riviera, has released a concept study focused on 'adaptable massing' for urban blocks. The study argues for a 'hard shell, soft centre' approach, where heavy masonry exteriors house fluid, modular interiors. By examining the economic risks of static floorplates—cited by RICS as a major factor in asset obsolescence—the studio proposes a technical system of dry-assembled partitions and centralised MEP services to allow for rapid unit reconfiguration.

Key takeaways

  • —Static internal layouts contribute significantly to long-term asset obsolescence and vacancy risk.
  • —Decoupling MEP services from internal walls enables unit reconfiguration in days rather than months.
  • —A 'hard shell, soft centre' approach preserves architectural character while allowing commercial fluidity.
  • —The 3.6m module serves as a universal anchor for both residential and professional workspace needs.

The problem of the static floorplate

In standard commercial and hospitality development, the division of space is often treated as a terminal decision. Once the thermal envelope is sealed and the core is cast, the internal arrangement remains largely fixed until the next major capital expenditure cycle. This rigidity creates a financial vulnerability for owners when market demands shift between studio, one-bedroom, or coworking configurations.

This concept study, an unbuilt exploration by ARCHITECTT, investigates the hypothesis that the primary internal partitions of a mixed-use block should be treated as furniture rather than infrastructure. By decoupling the residential or commercial unit from the structural slab, we examine how a building might maintain 100% occupancy by physically expanding or contracting its internal volumes to meet shifting tenant requirements.

The technical hypothesis of the loose fit

The study proposes a structural grid based on a 3.6-metre module, a width that accommodates both functional sleeping quarters and efficient workspace desk layouts. In this hypothetical model, the MEP (mechanical, electrical, plumbing) services are not buried in the walls. Instead, they are distributed via a continuous perimeter plinth and a central spine within a raised floor system.

By centralising services, the internal partitions—constructed from lightweight, dry-assembled timber or recycled composite panels—become non-structural assets. In this scenario, a three-bedroom apartment could be reconfigured into two separate professional studios within a 48-hour window, without the demolition waste or structural risk typical of traditional refurbishment.

Economic rationale for adaptability

The investment case for adaptable massing rests on the mitigation of obsolescence. According to data from the RICS (Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, 2023), the cost of internal reconfiguration is one of the highest risks in long-term asset management. If a building is designed for a fifty-year lifespan but its internal layout is obsolete within ten, the capital intensity of the necessary retrofitting often leads to vacancy or underperformance.

FeatureConventional Fixed LayoutARCHITECTT Adaptable Concept
Partition TypeWet-trade / Stud & TrackDry-assembled modular panels
Service AccessChased into wallsPerimeter plinth / Raised floor
Reconfiguration Time4–6 weeks48–72 hours
Material WasteHigh (Single-use)Low (Reusable components)

The study explores the use of "plug-in" wet cells. Instead of fixed bathrooms that dictate the entire floor plan, these units are positioned against the service spine, allowing for the relocation of kitchens and bathrooms with minimal intervention to the primary slab.

Mass and circulation as constants

While the interior remains fluid, the mass and circulation of the building remain the anchors of the design. The study focuses on a heavy masonry or concrete external envelope that provides the necessary thermal mass and acoustic separation from the street. The circulation—stairs and elevators—occupies a central, high-density core.

This creates a "hard shell, soft centre" architecture. The light hierarchy is controlled through deep-set apertures in the heavy facade, ensuring that regardless of whether the interior is a single large volume or three smaller ones, every zone retains access to natural light and ventilation. We hypothesize that the value of the asset is held in this permanent exterior and the flexibility of the interior, rather than a specific room count fixed at the point of planning.

The logistics of the movable wall

Implementation of such a system requires a shift in procurement. Rather than a one-time fit-out, the building operates under a continuous maintenance and reconfiguration contract. The study imagines a library of internal components—walls, doors, and cabinetry—held on-site or in nearby storage.

This approach acknowledges that the developer is not just selling square metres, but a managed environment that can evolve. The study concludes that while the initial capital expenditure on a raised floor and modular partitions may be higher than standard drywall, the reduction in lifecycle costs and the ability to pivot the product mix in response to market cycles provides a superior risk-adjusted return for the long-term holder.

Sources and method

  • RICS (2023): Data on lifecycle costs and reconfiguration risks in commercial real estate. Used as a baseline for economic risk assessment.
  • Global Construction Perspectives / Oxford Economics (2024 Forecast): Projections on the rising cost of demolition and waste disposal in Europe, supporting the shift toward circular, dry-assembly methods.
  • Eurostat (2023): Building stock and vacancy rate statistics provided the context for why "static" buildings fail to meet changing urban demographic needs.
  • Methodology: This study is an original hypothesis by ARCHITECTT. It uses standard structural spans and existing modular construction techniques to test the feasibility of non-structural internal division in high-density urban blocks.

Questions answered

Is this a completed project or a conceptual study?+

This is a hypothetical concept study exploring adaptability. It is currently unbuilt and serves as a design research framework for future developer partnerships.

How is the technical flexibility achieved without high renovation costs?+

The concept utilizes a 3.6-metre structural grid combined with a raised floor and perimeter service plinth. This allows non-structural, dry-assembled partitions to be moved without cutting into the slab or chasing walls.

Does this model increase initial construction costs for developers?+

While initial capital expenditure for the modular components and raised floors is typically higher, the study argues that the reduction in long-term vacancy and the avoidance of demolition costs during reconfigurations provide a higher risk-adjusted return.

References

  1. rics.org
  2. ec.europa.eu
  3. oxfordeconomics.com

Continue reading

  • This is a concept study. It does not describe a commissioned, approved or built project.
  • The image on this page was generated by ARCHITECTT using AI tools.

Press enquiries: hello@architectt.com

Published with support from the ARCHITECTT AI Publishing Office. Minor inaccuracies or typos may occur.